.
Feedback

Graniterock Strike Resolved

The labor action impacted company sites near Watsonville, Gilroy and Redwood City, halting work for three days.

A labor strike at Watsonville-based Graniterock that brought work to a grinding halt Sunday was resolved late Tuesday, company spokesman Keith Severson reported.

The strike involved 75-100 employees in Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3, one of 5 labor unions at Graniterock, Severson said.

“It’s unfortunate," Severson said of the strike. "It's a busy time of year."

Severson said he didn't know what spurred the strike, but Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3’s Ken Edgecombe told SanJoseInside.com that the union hasn't has a contract in over a year.

The union decided Friday to push Graniterock to negotiate. The strike came when the company refused to meet with labor leaders, Pete Figueiredo of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 told SanJoseInside.com. Figueiredo went on to say the union had eight agreements with Graniterock and some had expired.

"The relationship with labor and Graniterock is decades old," Severson said. "These issues are sometimes longstanding and it’s really nice that they are resolved and we can all get back to business and usual.”

Negotiations were completed around 10:30 p.m. Tuesday, Severson said. Employees were back to work Wednesday.

The Operating Engineers work at several sites in Northern California. Severson said the strike affected the Aromas quarry outside of Watsonville and Gilroy, as well as locations near Hollister, in Redwood City and in San Jose.

However, SanJoseInside.com reported the labor action was even larger as "picketers descended upon the company’s recycling plant at Monterey Highway and Capitol Expressway, at the sand and gravel facility in Hollister and at Graniterock operations in San Jose’s Berryessa district, Redwood City and South San Francisco" in addition to the A.R. Wilson Quarry in Aromas.

Graniterock supplies paving materials to many municipalities. Earlier this month its subsidiary Pavex was awarded a $35.9 million contract with the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority to make improvements to the Hwy. 101 interchanges at Yerba Buena Road and Capitol Expressway, the Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal reported. The company also was the contractor for the Mineta San Jose International Airport taxiway extension, after the airport received $7.49 million from the Federal Aviation Administration.

A 2004 strike involving Graniterock concrete ready-mix drivers represented by Teamsters Local 287 went all the way to the U.S. Surpreme Court before the lawsuit was resolved in 2008.

Graniterock is lead by President and CEO Tom Squeri, the former vice president and general counsel who succeeded longtime company head Bruce Woolpert earlier this summer. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Gilroy Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Ann KannelyPuente May 24, 2013 at 09:24 pm
The other issue is if the Library is run by volunteers then union jobs will be lost. In other wordsRead More if the work can be done for free why pay someone.
Laura Case May 24, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Ken Simmons, I don't know who made you privy to the information that you have, but you should haveRead More checked your sources. The information you have posted here is inaccurate and misleading. Yes, it is due to budgets cuts and recommendations of the country fiscal advisor that all Library Clerk II positions have been eliminated, but note that it is all. And there was never a decision to pack up the books and put them in storage. On the contrary, the collection will stay intact, and will be covered and protected the same way it is every summer to prevent sun and dust damage. No parents have come forward to volunteer to run the library. Not one! And the decisions that have been made by the district are exactly that, the District's - the unions are not the problem here. If you want to stir up drama, try sticking to the truth, and try using it to make a difference and set things right for our students!
John May 31, 2013 at 11:42 am
Laura - I do not know what your position is or where your information comes from. With respect toRead More this particular issue, I have no knowledge, but as a former contractor whose kids went to public schools, I tried several times to clean up/repair/restore bathrooms, replace rotting windows and frames, etc. only to be told "NO", and not just no, but emphatically so. Only from the janitors and maintenance personnel could I find a rational reason, which was the protection of union jobs. Not really rational, however, as the maintenance people were all supportive of getting the work done (completely for free), as they admitted they would never,ever be able to get to it, even if they had the skills. Additionally, as a former tutor through the "No Child Left Behind" program, I think anyone would find it impossible to volunteer to do such a thing as tutoring - for pretty much the same reasons. Private schools thrive and blossom through the use of volunteers. Our area especially is overflowing with qualified people that could and would volunteer to help our schools. As the population ages, the available pool of potential volunteers will grow substantially. Many of the schools' problems could be addressed through the use of volunteers for everything from maintenance to kitchen help to tutoring and, yes, even teaching - god forbid. Will any of this happen? Not as long as the unions are primarily out for themselves and the districts are circling the wagons, both pretty much ignoring the needs of their students. Think about all of this the next time a school bond measure comes up. More money is not the answer. Far less money might help drive true results actually reflected in benefits to the kids.
R. Gabriner May 13, 2013 at 02:37 pm
Nice work Blanca. An excellent student in our program. Dr. Robert Gabriner, Director, EducationalRead More Leadership Doctoral Program San Francisco State University
Berto April 12, 2013 at 07:27 pm
From one of the interviews I watched online, it seems that many Saratoga High students knew whatRead More happened at the party and had seen the pictures. How is it that arrests did not follow the assault and the suicide for over 6 months? Could it be that the students who knew information about the felony chose to remain silent? I hope that is not the case; we will surely find out as the details of the case are revealed in the media over the next weeks and months. In the meantime lets make sure we are teaching our kids about the responsibility of living in community and caring about others. God forbid that any of the students have to live with the knowledge that they could have prevented the suicide, or with the knowledge that they helped cover up such a heinous crime.
Tamra~Kathleen April 13, 2013 at 05:51 pm
The offensive comment we're discussing shows a complete lack of respect for women that permeates ourRead More culture. That this person actually thought this poor young girl had culpability for her attack is a symptom of our societies disregard for women. I'm actually glad he made the comment so we can look at and discuss the problem.
Raymond Ruiz April 13, 2013 at 10:54 pm
It just don't matter how she dresses,whoo her parents are or aren't. Nobody and I mean Nobody hasRead More the right to rape or force a femsle to have sex with her,and then to make matters worse,they posted pictures of her on facebook ! Better we as a community should be asking,what would possess the young guys to do something like this ! That is why We have Our teenagers and kids passwords or no internet period ! As a parent my heart goes out to het and her parents !