.
Feedback

Council Preview: Should Gilroy City Council Meet Later?

A group is requesting that Gilroy City Council meetings start at 7 p.m.

Gilroy City Council meets at 6 p.m. — the earliest council meeting time of 15 cities in Santa Clara County, according to Save Our Gilroy Foothills.

Save Our Gilroy Foothills is a group dedicated to educating the community on planned developments and other Foothills issues. They are requesting that council consider the meeting time change at its Feb. 25 meeting.

An online survey in late-2011 found that 73 percent of the responders wanted the Gilroy City Council meetings changed to 7 p.m. A total of 200 signatures were also collected requesting that the meeting time be changed.

“We believe that the majority of the Gilroy residents who work do commute to their workplace. Having the early meeting time creates a detriment for residents to attend the council meeting and for some, impossibility,” the group writes.

Gilroy City Council will also consider making amendments to ordinances regarding residential areas in the city during its Feb. 4 meeting.

During the Jan. 28 meeting, councilmembers were first introduced to the ordinance changes, but councilmember Terri Aulman was absent. The ordinance would amend the Downtown Gilroy Specific Plan and Gilroy Zoning Ordinance to establish a minimum density of 20 units per acre for the residential portion of the mixed-use projects in the History, Cannery and Expansion districts, staff reports.

Another ordinance would amend the zoning map to rezone as many as 12 high-density residential parcels.

Gilroy City Council meets at 6 p.m. today, Feb. 4, at Gilroy City Hall, 7351 Rosanna St.

You can view the agenda here.

What do you think? Should the meeting time be changed? Tell us in the comment section below. 

Stay Patched in! Follow Gilroy Patch on Facebook and Twitter. Sign up for the daily newsletters.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Gilroy Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laura Case May 24, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Ken Simmons, I don't know who made you privy to the information that you have, but you should haveRead More checked your sources. The information you have posted here is inaccurate and misleading. Yes, it is due to budgets cuts and recommendations of the country fiscal advisor that all Library Clerk II positions have been eliminated, but note that it is all. And there was never a decision to pack up the books and put them in storage. On the contrary, the collection will stay intact, and will be covered and protected the same way it is every summer to prevent sun and dust damage. No parents have come forward to volunteer to run the library. Not one! And the decisions that have been made by the district are exactly that, the District's - the unions are not the problem here. If you want to stir up drama, try sticking to the truth, and try using it to make a difference and set things right for our students!
Mary Ann KannelyPuente May 24, 2013 at 09:24 pm
The other issue is if the Library is run by volunteers then union jobs will be lost. In other wordsRead More if the work can be done for free why pay someone.
Mary Ann KannelyPuente May 24, 2013 at 09:22 pm
I information I read in the Gilroy Dispatch is that all the part time library clerks will be laidRead More off. So there will be no staff to run the library. Luigi probably has no storage for all those books so they will be left on the shelves. This recommendation was made by the County Fiscal Advisor, Nimrat Johal. She said this won't impact the students or the classroom. Really???!!!
R. Gabriner May 13, 2013 at 02:37 pm
Nice work Blanca. An excellent student in our program. Dr. Robert Gabriner, Director, EducationalRead More Leadership Doctoral Program San Francisco State University
Raymond Ruiz April 13, 2013 at 10:54 pm
It just don't matter how she dresses,whoo her parents are or aren't. Nobody and I mean Nobody hasRead More the right to rape or force a femsle to have sex with her,and then to make matters worse,they posted pictures of her on facebook ! Better we as a community should be asking,what would possess the young guys to do something like this ! That is why We have Our teenagers and kids passwords or no internet period ! As a parent my heart goes out to het and her parents !
Tamra~Kathleen April 13, 2013 at 05:51 pm
The offensive comment we're discussing shows a complete lack of respect for women that permeates ourRead More culture. That this person actually thought this poor young girl had culpability for her attack is a symptom of our societies disregard for women. I'm actually glad he made the comment so we can look at and discuss the problem.
Berto April 12, 2013 at 07:27 pm
From one of the interviews I watched online, it seems that many Saratoga High students knew whatRead More happened at the party and had seen the pictures. How is it that arrests did not follow the assault and the suicide for over 6 months? Could it be that the students who knew information about the felony chose to remain silent? I hope that is not the case; we will surely find out as the details of the case are revealed in the media over the next weeks and months. In the meantime lets make sure we are teaching our kids about the responsibility of living in community and caring about others. God forbid that any of the students have to live with the knowledge that they could have prevented the suicide, or with the knowledge that they helped cover up such a heinous crime.