.
Feedback

Business Owners Ask Council to Modify Strict Requirements of Sign Ordinance

Business owners fear that strict regulations limiting the type of advertising signs they can use within city limits will hurt their livelihood.

Council members discussed varying agenda items during Monday’s meeting, ranging from the city’s far-reaching sign ordinance to the adoption of a weed abatement program.

Under Gilroy’s current sign ordinance, flags, pennants, balloons, streamers, lighted signs and “objects designed to move” are prohibited in the city, while portable signs, banners, window and A-frame signs have restrictions on how often and where they can be displayed.


Three local auto-dealership owners spoke before the council in support of regulating some signage, but worried that extensive regulations could harm their ability to bring in business.

Leonard Harrington, owner of South County Nissan Hyundai, urged the council to look at auto-dealer sign ordinances in other cities’ and adjust Gilroy’s accordingly.

“We are in an extremely tough retail environment,” he said. “We have to compete with dealers in San Jose and it’s tough. We need to be competitive.”

Any action by the council, Councilman Peter Arellano said, should be to limit the ordinances and allow businesses to make an income.

Councilman Peter Arellano said any action taken by the council should be to limit the scope of ordinance and allow businesses to make an income.

“If auto-dealers want a dinosaur or a gorilla on their roof, let them have it,” he said.

A future study session will be open to business owners who wish to express their opinion on how best to balance aesthetics with advertising, Mayor Al Pinheiro said. A specific time and date has yet to be confirmed.

In other news, the council unanimously approved the establishment of a list of properties identified through the county's. The program aims to rid the city of weeds that have become a “nuisance” and possible fire hazard by ordering specified property owners to clear their land of the invasive plant or face charges.

Moe Kumre, the program coordinator for the county’s program, informed the council that when a property is added to the list, it remains there for three years regardless of ownership.

“There are no fees associated if the property is maintained for those consecutive years,” he said. “We are going to make sure the property owners are keeping up with their obligation to keep their property fire-safe. After three years of compliance, [their property] is removed from the [list].”

Below are a couple additional highlights from Monday’s meeting:

  • The council unanimously approved a 50-year lease agreement for the new Gilroy library,. The agreement is between the city and the Santa Clara County Library District Joint Powers Authority. The lease, staff said, will allow the city to get first rights on any community facility rooms after the library establishes its own activities. The library has also agreed to maintain the interior and exterior of the property as well as pay for some of the building’s maintenance. The city’s commitment to the facility is to maintain the grounds. Staff also reported that the ongoing lease contract with the library will contribute a total of $6 million in payments to the city over a 30 year period.
  • The council approved a new annexation process in which property owners along Santa Teresa Blvd. who wish to become part of the Landscape Maintenance Community Facilities District can join with a signature. Teresa Mak, a development engineer for the city, said the simplified, cheaper process allows property owners to utilize the city’s landscape maintenance services while paying a tax of $91 per year for each parcel of property.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Gilroy Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Mary Ann KannelyPuente May 24, 2013 at 09:24 pm
The other issue is if the Library is run by volunteers then union jobs will be lost. In other wordsRead More if the work can be done for free why pay someone.
Laura Case May 24, 2013 at 10:37 pm
Ken Simmons, I don't know who made you privy to the information that you have, but you should haveRead More checked your sources. The information you have posted here is inaccurate and misleading. Yes, it is due to budgets cuts and recommendations of the country fiscal advisor that all Library Clerk II positions have been eliminated, but note that it is all. And there was never a decision to pack up the books and put them in storage. On the contrary, the collection will stay intact, and will be covered and protected the same way it is every summer to prevent sun and dust damage. No parents have come forward to volunteer to run the library. Not one! And the decisions that have been made by the district are exactly that, the District's - the unions are not the problem here. If you want to stir up drama, try sticking to the truth, and try using it to make a difference and set things right for our students!
John May 31, 2013 at 11:42 am
Laura - I do not know what your position is or where your information comes from. With respect toRead More this particular issue, I have no knowledge, but as a former contractor whose kids went to public schools, I tried several times to clean up/repair/restore bathrooms, replace rotting windows and frames, etc. only to be told "NO", and not just no, but emphatically so. Only from the janitors and maintenance personnel could I find a rational reason, which was the protection of union jobs. Not really rational, however, as the maintenance people were all supportive of getting the work done (completely for free), as they admitted they would never,ever be able to get to it, even if they had the skills. Additionally, as a former tutor through the "No Child Left Behind" program, I think anyone would find it impossible to volunteer to do such a thing as tutoring - for pretty much the same reasons. Private schools thrive and blossom through the use of volunteers. Our area especially is overflowing with qualified people that could and would volunteer to help our schools. As the population ages, the available pool of potential volunteers will grow substantially. Many of the schools' problems could be addressed through the use of volunteers for everything from maintenance to kitchen help to tutoring and, yes, even teaching - god forbid. Will any of this happen? Not as long as the unions are primarily out for themselves and the districts are circling the wagons, both pretty much ignoring the needs of their students. Think about all of this the next time a school bond measure comes up. More money is not the answer. Far less money might help drive true results actually reflected in benefits to the kids.
R. Gabriner May 13, 2013 at 02:37 pm
Nice work Blanca. An excellent student in our program. Dr. Robert Gabriner, Director, EducationalRead More Leadership Doctoral Program San Francisco State University
Berto April 12, 2013 at 07:27 pm
From one of the interviews I watched online, it seems that many Saratoga High students knew whatRead More happened at the party and had seen the pictures. How is it that arrests did not follow the assault and the suicide for over 6 months? Could it be that the students who knew information about the felony chose to remain silent? I hope that is not the case; we will surely find out as the details of the case are revealed in the media over the next weeks and months. In the meantime lets make sure we are teaching our kids about the responsibility of living in community and caring about others. God forbid that any of the students have to live with the knowledge that they could have prevented the suicide, or with the knowledge that they helped cover up such a heinous crime.
Tamra~Kathleen April 13, 2013 at 05:51 pm
The offensive comment we're discussing shows a complete lack of respect for women that permeates ourRead More culture. That this person actually thought this poor young girl had culpability for her attack is a symptom of our societies disregard for women. I'm actually glad he made the comment so we can look at and discuss the problem.
Raymond Ruiz April 13, 2013 at 10:54 pm
It just don't matter how she dresses,whoo her parents are or aren't. Nobody and I mean Nobody hasRead More the right to rape or force a femsle to have sex with her,and then to make matters worse,they posted pictures of her on facebook ! Better we as a community should be asking,what would possess the young guys to do something like this ! That is why We have Our teenagers and kids passwords or no internet period ! As a parent my heart goes out to het and her parents !